Production engineering
Build for accuracy, resilience, integration and long-term operation.
- APIs and integrations
- Production infrastructure
- Data processing
- Failure handling
◈Selected work & AI systems
I’m Yuri Samoilovski, founder of TaskGeniusAI. I help businesses bring disconnected systems, workflows and data together so their operations become clearer, more efficient and intelligently automated.
My perspective comes from both sides: building and operating businesses across multiple sectors, partnering closely with other business owners, and spending roughly 15 years engineering production systems across payments, APIs, infrastructure, automation and applied AI. That combination helps me understand how a business actually operates — and build technology around the operation, rather than forcing the operation around the technology.
My background combines two perspectives that do not always exist in the same room. I have spent roughly 15 years building production systems where reliability, accuracy, security and failure handling matter. I have also operated businesses myself, where software is judged by whether it makes the work clearer, more dependable and easier to control.
That combination shapes how I approach AI: understand how the work moves, establish what can be trusted, and then decide where intelligence belongs.
Experience building and operating businesses across different commercial and customer-facing models — working directly with acquisition, fulfillment, payments, customer experience, staffing, financial operations and growth.
◆Built and operated a business that exceeded $1 million in first-year revenue.
These are not four separate careers. Each one keeps correcting the others, and they are all judged against the same thing.
Build for accuracy, resilience, integration and long-term operation.
Turn complex capabilities into understandable tools and workflows.
Judge the system by how it performs during real work and real pressure.
Place intelligence inside a defined workflow with evidence, review and accountability.
Judged byUseful, trustworthy systems
Enterprise AI-assisted engineering workflow
Some of my enterprise work has focused on turning large technical specifications into structured, reviewable engineering inputs. The goal is not simply to generate text. It is to reduce repetitive interpretation while keeping validation and engineering judgment at the point where output becomes a real decision.
Every extracted requirement keeps a line back to the clause it came from, validation runs before anyone is asked to judge the result, and review can send work back rather than only wave it through.
The same enterprise work has also included automating how work moves through large organizations — carrying support and engineering requests through intake, classification, routing, escalation, developer assignment, implementation, QA and code review instead of hand-coordinating each step. Across pipelines that span several teams, that removes a great deal of repetitive coordination.
Details generalized to protect confidential work. Client identity, proprietary architecture, internal metrics, source code and confidential materials are intentionally excluded.
TaskGeniusAI grew from a pattern I kept seeing across operating businesses: the company already had software, but its activity, money, work and next decisions lived in different places. The product connects those records into one operating picture and keeps what it knows — and what it does not yet know — visible.
The packaged Platform is built first around service operations. The same connected-systems approach can be applied selectively to other complex operational workflows through Custom AI Systems.
Synthetic demo workspace — no customer data


An item states what was noticed, the records behind it, and what it cannot yet support — booking evidence partial, recovery evidence confirmed, first-response time unavailable. The proposed next move sits with the evidence, not in place of it.

Every figure carries its coverage and its freshness, and receivables stay separate from revenue because their underlying status differs. Operating profit is not estimated to fill the gap: it reads unavailable, and the page names the five cost inputs required to compute it.

Current, stale, partial and missing are four different states, and the system says which one it is looking at rather than resolving them all into a confident number.
A technically impressive system still fails if the people operating it cannot understand it, trust it, or use it when the work gets busy.
No prepared solution — just a useful conversation about the systems, workflows and decisions behind the work.